Perez v. Groose’s Empirical Analysis
973 F.2d 630 · 1992
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Wright v. West · Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund v. Presti · Tompkins v. Florida · State v. Perez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Flieger v. Delo · Flieger v. Delo“not required to rule out every hypothesis except that of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Flieger v. Delo · Flieger v. Delo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.