Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 973 F.2d 673 - Jones v. Frank

Jones v. Frank’s Empirical Analysis

973 F.2d 673 · 1992

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably Hutson v. McDonnell Douglas Corp. (1995), Harvey v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (1994)

23 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

3401992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co. · Holmes v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[t]he elements of a prima facie case vary with the circumstances of the alleged discrimination.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must rest on proof that she and the three men are `similarly situated in all relevant respects,'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “must show that she is a member of a protected class who was qualified for but was denied reinstatement, while a similarly situated employee outside of her protected class ... was reinstated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.