Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 973 F.2d 773 - Intlekofer v. Turnage

Intlekofer v. Turnage’s Empirical Analysis

973 F.2d 773 · 1992

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
3
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably Laber v. Harvey (2006), Steiner v. Showboat Operating Co. (1994)

26 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

2801992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Thurston · United States v. McConney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"With respect to conduct between fellow employees, an employer is responsible for acts of sexual harassment in the workplace where the employer (or its agents or supervisory employees) knows or should have known of the conduct, unless it can show that it took immediate and appropriate corrective action."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[H]arassment is to be remedied through actions targeted at the harasser, not the victim.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “must include some form of disciplinary action,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.