United States v. Barela’s Empirical Analysis
973 F.2d 852 · 1992
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on United States v. Young · Lane v. Peterson · ITT Gilfillan v. Clayton · United States v. Rutter · United States v. Burns
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we review the evidence and all reasonable inferences that may be drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the government.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“same course of conduct or common scheme or plan as the offense of conviction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“offenses for which grouping of counts would be required under § 3D1.2(d) had the defendant been convicted of multiple counts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.