Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 973 F.2d 96 - Grant v. Martinez

Grant v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis

973 F.2d 96 · 1992

Citation profile

164
cited by 164 later decisions
4
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 21 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 164 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Murphy v. Lynn (1997), Quaratino v. Tiffany & Co. (1999)

22 federal appellate · 21 district · 6 state decisions

700199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1961 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Brewster v. Derwinski · Maher v. Gagne · City of Riverside v. Rivera · Blanchard v. Bergeron

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 164 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]lthough there is a `strong presumption that the lodestar figure represents the reasonable fee,' other considerations may lead to an upward or downward departure from the lodestar.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “not whether hindsight vindicates an attorney's time expenditures, but whether, at the time the work was performed, a reasonable attorney would have engaged in similar time expenditures.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a reasonable attorney's fee ... as part of the costs.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.