State v. Studd’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
92 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably State v. Momah (2009), State v. McDonald (1999)
92 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Sandstrom v. Montana · Bousley v. United States · 127 Wash. 2d 322 - State v. McFarland · Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[trial] counsel can hardly be faulted for requesting a jury instruction based upon a then-unquestioned WPIC 16.02.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“`below an objective standard of reasonableness based on consideration of all the circumstances.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Woods · State v. Carter“We will not overrule such binding precedent sub silentio.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.