Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 973 P2D 1213 - Nicholas v. People

Nicholas v. People’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2025

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions

1401999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gault · Fare v. Michael C. · Lewis v. State · Commonwealth v. McCutchen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as a general rule of statutory construction, [the] enumeration of exclusions from the operation of a statute indicates that the statute should apply to all cases not specifically excluded.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Where the language is clear and unambiguous, we need not resort to rules of statutory construction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is provided (quoting 2A Norman J. Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction § 47.283, at 217 (5th ed.1992))). 129 Therefore, we reject Allstate's argument that additional categories of claimants are excluded from the statutory definition. 1 30 Although review of legislative history was not required given the plain language of the statute, we have reviewed it thoroughly and conclude it does not contradict our reading of the statute. Despite references by the bill's sponsor to claims by”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.