State v. McCorkle’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 62 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably United States v. Hammoud (2004), State v. Ford (1999)
2 federal appellate · 62 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 105 Wash. 2d 175 - State v. Ammons · State v. Sanwick · State v. Ford · 121 Wash. 2d 707 - State v. Mail · State v. Ford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]here the State fails to carry its burden of proof after a specific objection, it would not be provided a further opportunity to do so.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gill · State v. Lopez“(1) allow opportunity for the trial court to correct the asserted error, and (2) put all parties on notice of the contended issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Audett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.