Walker v. Weber County’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 2025
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Renn v. Utah State Board of Pardons · Olson v. Salt Lake City School District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“under [Section 608], the capabilities and intentions of the drafter of the ballot title are relevant to whether the result meets the statute's purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burr v. City of Orem“is unsatisfactory or does not comply with the requirements of this section.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burr v. City of Orem“to entertain writ proceedings under rule 65B in appropriate circum stances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Anderson v. Bell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.