Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 973 S.W.2d 682 - Anders v. State

Anders v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2000
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 241st Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Cain v. State · Crawford v. Georgia · Rezac v. State · Allridge v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Constitutional Error. If the appellate record in a criminal case reveals constitutional error that is subject to harmless error review, the court of appeals must reverse a judgment of conviction or punishment unless the court determines beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to the conviction or punishment. (b) Other Errors. Any other error, defect, irregularity, or variance that does not affect substantial rights must be disregarded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.