Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 973 SW2D 70 - Logston v. Commonwealth

Logston v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2004
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. California · New York v. Ferber · Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena · United States v. Knox · People v. Kongs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the predominate appeal of the matter taken as a whole is to a prurient interest in sexual conduct involving minors”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “exhibition of the genitals ... for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[f]lagellation or excretion for the purpose of sexual stimulation or gratification,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.