Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 974 F.2d 1099 - Hendricks v. Vasquez

Hendricks v. Vasquez’s Empirical Analysis

974 F.2d 1099 · 1992

Citation profile

133
cited by 133 later decisions
6
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

85 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 133 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably Bonin v. Calderon (1995), Sanders v. Ratelle (1994)

85 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions

8801992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Estelle v. McGuire · Wainwright v. Witt · Caldwell v. Mississippi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 133 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Brown v. Myers · Haro v. Borg
  2. “A habeas petitioner is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a claim if (1) the petitioner's allegations, if proved, would entitle him to relief, and (2) the state court trier of fact has not, after a full and fair hearing, reliably found the relevant facts.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Brown v. Myers · Brewer v. Bj Bunnell
  3. “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Haro v. Borg · Parrott v. Aj Arave Imsi

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.