Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

974 F.2d 1331

Docket No. 91-1639.

Jeffress v. Titius and Seius

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: October 31, 1991 Decided: August 31, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-08-31

Relies on Jones v. Thompson

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-08-31

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-90-256-R)

Jesse Wilson Jeffress, Appellant Pro Se.

Roger Lewis Chaffe, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Charles F. Midkiff, Regina Maria Policano, Midkiff & Hiner, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Margaret Ann Dean Moncure, Charlotte Courthouse, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

Affirmed.

Before WILKINSON, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Jesse Wilson Jeffress appeals from the district court's order denying several post-judgment motions. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that there was no abuse of discretion and this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jeffress v. Titius and Seius, No. CA-90256-R (W.D. Va. May 20, 1991). Jeffress' pending motions are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/974/f2d/1331 · .json · Public domain