Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

974 F.2d 1331

Docket No. 91-6322.

Johnson v. Taylor J

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: February 21, 1992 Decided: August 25, 1992

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-08-25

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Jones v. Thompson

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-08-25

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior District Judge. (CA-90-2721-MJG)

James Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

Affirmed.

Before SPROUSE, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

James Johnson appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Taylor, No. CA-90-2721-MJG (D. Md. Sept. 25, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/974/f2d/1331 · .json · Public domain