Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

974 F.2d 1333

Docket No. 92-6315.

Irvin Lee Wilson v. Eugene M. Nuth J. Joseph Curran, Jr.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: May 1, 1992 Decided: September 2, 1992

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-09-02

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 1992

18 federal appellate ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-09-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Irvin Lee Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Sarah Elizabeth Page, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Irvin Lee Wilson appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. Nuth, No. CA-90-1952 (D. Md. Dec. 31, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/974/f2d/1333 · .json · Public domain