Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 974 F.2d 182 - United States v. Davis

United States v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

974 F.2d 182 · 1992

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
7
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably United States v. Saro (1994), State v. Stanley (1998)

13 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

1201992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3481 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Young · United States v. Frady · Rock v. Arkansas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[p]erjury warnings are not improper per se and that `the Sixth Amendment is not implicated every time a prosecutor or trial court offers advice regarding the penalties of perjury.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A defendant's] rights are not trenched upon by mere information or advice about the possibility of a perjury prosecution, but by deliberate and badgering threats designed to quash significant testimony.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Indeed, there are circumstances when warnings about the possibility and consequences of a perjury charge are warranted-even prudent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.