Frey v. Fulcomer’s Empirical Analysis
974 F.2d 348 · 1992
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Ouber v. Guarino (2002), Hill v. Mitchell (2005)
8 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Lockett v. Ohio · Eddings v. Oklahoma · Pulley v. Harris · Walton v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shortcomings, though highly unfortunate, have not undermined [our] confidence in the outcome.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Frey v. Fulcomer“A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.