Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 974 F.2d 653 - King v. Chide

King v. Chide’s Empirical Analysis

974 F.2d 653 · 1992

Citation profile

119
cited by 119 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

64 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 119 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Baker v. Putnal (1996), Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter v. Cedar Point Oil Co. (1996)

64 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

950199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Graham v. Connor · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Tennessee v. Garner · Siegert v. Gilley · Hudson v. McMillian

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 119 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] nonmoving party is not entitled to rest on his pleadings, but must carry his burden of providing evidence of a genuine issue of material fact.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “That burden can be met by depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file and affidavits.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.