Jackson v. Speer’s Empirical Analysis
974 F.2d 676 · 1992
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably Rubinstein v. Collins (1994), Haber Oil Co. v. Swinehart (1994)
6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Trenholm v. Ratcliff · Quinn v. Press · Williams v. Khalaf · Wise v. Anderson · Richardson v. Washington & Costley Bros.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If ... the injured party is not aware of the fraud or the fraud is concealed, the statute of limitations begins to run from the time the fraud is discovered or could have been discovered by the defrauded party’s exercise of reasonable diligence. Knowledge of facts that would lead a reasonably prudent person to make inquiry which would lead to a discovery of the fraud is knowledge of the fraud itself.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) A material representation was made; (2) The representation was false; (3) The speaker knew the representation was false when he made it; (4) The representation was made with the expectation that it would be relied upon by the other party; (5) The other party acted in reasonable reliance on the representation; and (6) The other party suffered injury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The absence from this state of a person against whom a cause of action may be maintained suspends the running of the applicable statute of limitations for the period of the person’s absence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.