Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 974 F.2d 75 - Noreen v. Slattengren

Noreen v. Slattengren’s Empirical Analysis

974 F.2d 75 · 1992

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
April 2018
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably In Re Barr (2006), Robinson v. Tenantry (1993)

7 federal appellate · 3 district ·

280199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1321 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 362

Relies on United States v. Estus · Education Assistance Corp. v. Zellner · Neufeld v. Freeman · Handeen v. LeMaire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[n]othing in the statutes or case law requires a hearing every time the issue of good faith is raised in a Chapter 13 proceeding. The bankruptcy court, exercising its sound discretion, is in the best position to determine when an evidentiary hearing on the issue of good faith is necessary.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “... a separate, independent determination ... [T]he proper inquiry should [analyze] whether the plan constitutes an abuse of the provisions, purpose or spirit of Chapter 13. The Bankruptcy Court must utilize its fact-finding expertise and judge each case on its own facts after considering all the circumstances of the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “... look at factors such as whether the debtor has stated his debts and expenses accurately; whether he has made any fraudulent misrepresentation to mislead the bankruptcy court; or whether he has unfairly manipulated the Bankruptcy Code.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.