Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 974 F. Supp. 2d 1042 - Cameron v. Hess Corp.

974 F. Supp. 2d 1042 - Cameron v. Hess Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Kelly v. Medical Life Insurance · Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]o provision of a contract is to be disregarded as inconsistent with other provisions, unless no other reasonable construction is possible”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Under Ohio law ... oil and gas leases are contracts subject to the well settled rules of contract construction and interpretation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.