Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 974 So. 2d 1052 - Williams v. Davis

974 So. 2d 1052 - Williams v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
2
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably 3 So. 3d 1035 - Wallace v. Dean (2009), Virgilio v. Ryland Group, Inc. (2012)

3 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

340200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 280 So. 2d 431 - Hoffman v. Jones · 593 So. 2d 500 - McCain v. Florida Power Corporation · 434 So. 2d 883 - Florida Bar · 30 Cal. 3d 358 - Sprecher v. Adamson Companies · Wood v. Camp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a reasonably close causal connection between the nonconforming conduct and the resulting injury to the claimant” (emphasis added) (quotation marks and citation omitted)); Sardell v. Malanio, 202 So.2d 746 , 747 (Fla. 1967) (A”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'(1) legislative enactments or administration regulations; (2) judicial interpretations of such enactments or regulations; (3) other judicial precedent; and (4) a duty arising from the general facts of the case.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “establishing the existence of a duty ... is a minimum threshold legal requirement that opens the courthouse doors to the moving party, and is ultimately a question of law for the court rather than a jury.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.