McGhee v. Biggs’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738A
Relies on 180 Ind. App. 351 - Campbell v. Campbell · 771 So. 2d 32 - MCR FUNDING v. CMG Funding Corp. · Partridge v. Partridge · 927 So. 2d 176 - Strommen v. Strommen · McCabe v. McCabe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]o the extent that the real issues in this case involve jurisdiction at all, they concern case jurisdiction, not subject matter jurisdiction”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“A judgment entered by a court which lacks subject matter jurisdiction is void and subject to collateral attack under rule 1.540 at any time.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.