Green v. Parrack’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2017
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 37th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Cain v. Bain · McGalliard v. Kuhlmann · Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Sunbelt Federal Savings · Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc. · Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an equitable remedy that prevents a plaintiff from asserting a claim due to lapse of time.” Green v. Parrack, 974 S.W.2d 200, 204 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1998, no pet.); see also Regent Intl. Hotels, Ltd. v. Las Colinas Hotels Corp., 704 S.W.2d 101, 106 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1985, no writ) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.