Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 974 SW2D 217 - Cox & Smith Inc. v. Cook

Cox & Smith Inc. v. Cook’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2016

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

100199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 73rd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Do you know why they have outlawed short skirts in Washington D.C.?” When prompted, the employee said, “[B]ecause Hillary Clinton’s balls would hang out.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.