Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 974 SW2D 70 - Thrift v. Hubbard

Thrift v. Hubbard’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

1 district · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Segal v. Emmes Capital, L.L.C. (2004), San Antonio Credit Union v. O'CONNOR (2003)

1 district · 21 state decisions

220199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 288th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Cain v. Bain · Pool v. Ford Motor Co. · Beck v. United States · Garrett v. United States · Stafford v. Stafford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he probable cause inquiry focuses only on the actions of the complainant, based upon his perspective of the facts at the time the report was made , and not on the subsequent actions of third-parties or information discovered after the fact”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the defendant lacked probable cause to instigate the prosecution”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.