Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 974 SW2D 729 - Ex Parte Bauder

Ex Parte Bauder’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Ex Parte Peterson (2003), Ex Parte Lewis (2007)

29 state decisions

220199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tibbs v. Florida · Oregon v. Kennedy · Bauder v. State · Bauder v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... on the one hand, whether the appellant's motion for mistrial was a choice he made in response to ordinary reversible error in order to avoid conviction, appeal, reversal, and retrial. Or, on the other hand, was he required to move for mistrial because the prosecutor deliberately or recklessly crossed "the line between legitimate adversarial gamesmanship and manifestly improper methods"... that rendered trial before the jury unfair to such a degree that no judicial admonishment could have cured it?”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Under this rule, the prosecutor is not accountable for mistrials when the trial judge need not have granted the defendant’s motion. But he is accountable for mistrials properly granted by the trial judge when the events making a mistrial necessary were of his own deliberate or reckless doing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.