United States v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
975 F.2d 1028 · 1992
Citation profile
78 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably United States v. Broughton-Jones (1995), United States v. Castner (1995)
78 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664
Relies on Hughey v. United States · United States v. Daughtrey · United States v. Bayerle · United States v. Bruchey · United States v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Also, the district court 'must make a factual determination that the defendant can feasibly comply with the order without undue hardship to himself or his dependents.'”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“As in theft cases, loss is the value of the money, property, or services unlawfully taken; it does not, for example, include interest the victim could have earned on such funds had the loss not occurred. [I]f an intended loss that the defendant was attempting to inflict can be determined, this figure will be used if it is greater than the actual loss.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A district court's failure to make a restitution order with which a defendant could possibly be expected to comply threatens respect for judicial orders generally.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.