United States v. Hernandez’s Empirical Analysis
975 F.2d 1035 · 1992
Citation profile
50 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably United States v. Queen (1997), United States v. Johnson (2010)
50 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Huddleston v. United States · Michelson v. United States · United States v. Masters · United States v. Rawle · United States v. Mark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) relevant to an issue other than character, (2) necessary, and (3) reliable.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“A court should exclude evidence when there is a genuine risk that the emotions of the jury will be excited to irrational behavior, and [ ] this risk is disproportionate to the probative value of the offered evidence.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.