Campbell v. Bartlett’s Empirical Analysis
975 F.2d 1569 · 1992
Citation profile
37 federal appellate · 9 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably United International Holdings, Inc. v. Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. (2000), Blanke v. Alexander (1998)
37 federal appellate · 9 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Addington v. Texas · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Motions served within 10 days of judgment 'ordinarily will fall under Rule 59(e),' while motions served later fall under Rule 60(b).”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“'absent an award so excessive or inadequate as to shock the judicial conscience and to raise an irresistible inference that passion, prejudice, corruption or other improper cause invaded the trial, the jury's determination of the fact is considered inviolate.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict of the jury is against the weight of the evidence is normally one of fact and not of law and is addressed to the discretion of the trial court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.