Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 975 F.2d 430 - United States v. Helton

United States v. Helton’s Empirical Analysis

975 F.2d 430 · 1992

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
1
states following
September 2001
most recently cited

46 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Pelaes v. United States · United States v. Franz · United States v. Poff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the district court refused to depart because of an 21 erroneous belief that it lacked the authority to do so, then 22 we would have jurisdiction to review that legal conclusion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Conversely, we will sustain an order of restitution if the district court considered the requisite factors enunciated in the statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “that the court failed to consider the mandatory factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3664. United States v. Ahmad, 2 F.3d 245 , 246-47 (7th Cir.1993); United States v. Boula, 997 F.2d 263 , 267 (7th Cir.1993); United States v. Helton, 975 F.2d 430 , 432 (7th Cir.1992); United States v. McClellan, 868 F.2d 210, 212 (7th Cir.1989).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.