McIntyre v. Trickey’s Empirical Analysis
975 F.2d 437 · 1992
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
September 1997
most recently cited
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Teague v. Lane · Brown v. Ohio · Grady v. Corbin · Dowling v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the stealing trial,. the government proved the same conduct it had proved to establish the entirety of the tampering offense; significantly, it proved that conduct to establish nearly the entirety of the stealing charge. McIntyre, 938 F.2d at 906 . This was not a situation involving a ‘mere overlap’ in proof.. See Felix, — U.S. at-, 112 S.Ct. at 1382 (“a mere overlap in proof between two prosecutions does not establish a double jeopardy violation”). The same conduct was proved at both trials to establish charges that were nearly identical.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McIntyre v. Caspari
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.