Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 975 F.2d 58 - Polymer Technology Corp. v. Mimran

Polymer Technology Corp. v. Mimran’s Empirical Analysis

975 F.2d 58 · 1992

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
September 2018
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Town of Hyde Park (1995), Blum v. Schlegel (1994)

16 federal appellate · 2 district ·

330199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carnegie v. United States · Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc. · Verderber v. Cantello Plumbing Corp. · Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co. · Jacoway v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a general rule, trademark law does not reach the sale of genuine goods bearing a true mark even though the sale is not authorized by the mark owner.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]ny person ... without the consent of the registrant ... use[s] in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of any goods ... [and] such use is likely to cause confusion....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “'an error of law, an error of fact, or an error in the substance or form of the trial court's order.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.