Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 975 F.2d 646 - Yniguez

Yniguez’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2013

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

100199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carey v. Piphus · Rideout v. United States · California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp. · ITT Continental Baking Co. v. William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. · Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he district court may now proceed to allow the parties to perfect their appeals and to conduct further proceedings in conformity with our dispositions.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “all other relief that the Court deems just and proper under the circumstances,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “may raise the issue of nominal damages in a future cross-appeal”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.