Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

975 F.2d 869

Docket No. 92-7023.

James H. Crouch, Claimant-Appellant v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Federal Circuit Court of Appeals

July 15, 1992. Rehearing Denied Aug. 25, 1992.

Federal Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-07-15

Applies 38 U.S.C. § 7292

Relies on Livingston v. Derwinski · Herman Douglas, Sr. v. Harry F. Manbeck, Jr., Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-07-15

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

Before NIES, Chief Judge, and MAYER and LOURIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Appellant seeks review of the judgment of the United States Court of Veterans Appeals affirming the denial of a claim for service-connected disability. Appellant challenges only factual determinations or the application of a law or regulation to his claim, or raises a legal question that does not contest the validity of a statute or a regulation, or the interpretation of a constitutional or statutory provision or a regulation. No issue is raised which falls within the jurisdiction of this court under 38 U.S.C. §§ 7292(c), (d)(1)-(2). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See Livingston v. Derwinski, 959 F.2d 224 (Fed.Cir.1992).

/975/f2d/869 · .json · Public domain