Matot v. CH’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
May 2018
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2701 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Russello v. United States · Leocal v. Ashcroft · United States v. Wiltberger · United States v. Autuori
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.