975 F. Supp. 2d 209 - Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Edelman v. Jordan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he doctrine of Ex parte Young permits a suit to proceed in federal court 'against a state official in his or her official capacity, notwithstanding the Eleventh Amendment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When determining whether a plaintiff has a claim of entitlement, [the courts] focus on the applicable statute, contract or regulation that purports to establish the benefit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[n]o State shall ... deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.