Wentworth v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2024
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Willis v. Willis · Bloomquist v. State · Jennings v. State · Blake v. State · Wetherelt v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The mind of an alleged offender may be read from his acts, his conduct, his words and the reasonable inferences which may be drawn from the cireumstances of the case. To hold otherwise would create an impossible burden in a case requiring a finding of specific intent."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Browning v. State · Jones v. State“(a) Except as authorized by this act, it is unlawful for any person to manufacture, deliver, or possess with intent to manufacture or deliver, a controlled substance. Any person who violates this subsection with respect to: (i) A controlled substance classified in Schedule I or II which is a narcotic drug, is guilty of a crime and upon conviction may be imprisoned for not more than twenty (20) years, or fined not more than twenty-five thousand dollars, ($25,000.00), or both; (i) Any other controlled substance classified in Schedule I, II or III, is guilty of a crime and upon conviction may be imprisoned for not more than ten (10) years, fined not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), or both{.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Contreras v. State“"[ W Ihether all the evidence which was presented is adequate enough to form the basis for a reasonable inference of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt to be drawn by a finder of fact when that evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the State."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marquez v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.