Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 975 So. 2d 1090 - Green v. State

975 So. 2d 1090 - Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
1
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably Tompkins v. State (2008), Johnston v. State (2011)

1 federal appellate · 56 state decisions

460200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Giglio v. United States · Kyles v. Whitley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “). In determining whether the evidence compels a new trial, the trial court must”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““To uphold the trial court’s summary denial of claims raised in a 3.850 motion, the claims must be either facially invalid or conclusively refuted by the record. Further, where no evidentiary hearing is held below, we must accept the defendant’s factual allegations to the extent they are not refuted by the record.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “review[s] the trial court's findings on questions of fact, the credibility of witnesses, and the weight of the evidence for competent, substantial evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.