¶1We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct sentence, but without prejudice to raising the issue in a timely, non-successive rule 8.850 motion. See generally Tennant v. State, 827 So.2d 321 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)..
975 So. 2d 576
Nix v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 20, 2008
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2008-02-20
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2013
4 state decisions
Relies on Tennant v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2008-02-20
View the full empirical analysis of this case →