Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 975 SW2D 212 - Wright v. Wright

Wright v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Woolridge v. Woolridge · Holmes v. Holmes · Jensen v. Jensen · In Re Marriage of Lawry · Luker v. Luker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “However, to properly frame the factual and legal issues for appeal so as to avoid needless reversals and remands, we would strongly suggest that where the trial court does “rebut” the presumed correct child support amount, it consider including in its findings why it found the amount to be unjust or inappropriate. In making such a finding, the trial court would only be articulating for the record what it is already required to do mentally by Rule 88.01.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.