Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

975 S.W.2d 493

Michael v. Woodruff

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 1, 1998

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1998-09-01

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2003

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-09-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Robert Woodruff appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiffs Larry L. Michael and Barbara S. Cornish on his counterclaim for breach of a sale agreement and default on a promissory note and for damages.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

/975/sw2d/493 · .json · Public domain