Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

976 A.2d 170

Boyd v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 7, 2009

Supreme Court of Delaware · decided 2009-07-07

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-07-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2023

4 state decisions

30200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

JERMAINE BOYD, Defendant Below, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

No. 156, 2009

¶1Supreme Court of Delaware.

July 7, 2009.

¶2

ORDER

¶3HENRY DuPONT RIDGELY, Justice

¶4This 7th day of July 2009, it appears to the Court that, on May 29, 2009, the Court issued a notice to appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for his failure to diligently prosecute his appeal by not filing his opening brief and appendix in this matter. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.

¶5NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.

/976/a2d/170 · .json · Public domain