United States v. Woods’s Empirical Analysis
976 F.2d 1096 · 1992
Citation profile
47 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently May 2011 · most notably United States of America v. Sedrick Robinson (1999), United States v. Napoli (1999)
47 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 1513 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 659
Relies on Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis v. Carver · Kashif v. United States · Foster v. North Texas Production Credit Ass'n · United States v. Jones · United States v. Fine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if they resulted from offenses that (1) occurred on the same occasion, (2) were part of a single common scheme or plan, or (3) were consolidated for trial or sentencing,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]f the criminal conduct is separated by arrests, the ensuing convictions are never considered related even if consolidated for trial or sentencing.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“offense for purposes of determining career offender status even though it may have been committed in furtherance of the underlying conspiracy which was the subject of the instant offense. See id. 8 Although current case law from this circuit indicates that it may be possible for a defendant to demonstrate the existence of a common scheme or plan where the convictions arose from a”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.