Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 976 F.2d 1104 - Brown v. United States

Brown v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

976 F.2d 1104 · 1992

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2024 · most notably Nabozny v. Podlesny (1996), Stewart v. McGinnis (1993)

29 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

3501992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 165 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1407

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Dewees v. United States · Goka v. Bobbitt · Martin v. Consultants & Administrators, Inc. · Herman v. City of Chicago

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a decision disposing of all the claims in only one of the cases is a final decision subject to immediate appeal”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The district court refused to consider Brown’s Rule 60(b) motion, assuming it had no jurisdiction to do so because a notice of appeal had been filed. In fact, the court did have jurisdiction to consider the motion. Parties may file motions under Rule 60(b) in the district court while an appeal is pending. In such circumstances we have directed district courts to review such motions promptly, and either deny them or, if the court is inclined to grant relief, to so indicate so that we may order a speedy remand.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “become a single judicial unit for purposes of [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure] 54(b), and accordingly a judgment that does not dispose of all claims of all parties is not appealable unless the district court makes the findings required by Rule 54(b).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.