Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 976 F.2d 118 - Vasbinder v. Scott

Vasbinder v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

976 F.2d 118 · 1992

Citation profile

108
cited by 108 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 108 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. W&O, Inc. (2000), Lynn Gorman-Bakos v. Cornell Cooperative

36 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

440199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Wade · Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip · McNamara v. County of San Diego Department of Social Services · Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey · Mississippi v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “make certain that... punitive damages are reasonable in their amount and rational in light of their purpose to punish what has occurred and to deter its repetition.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “constitute a disproportionately large percentage of the defendant's net worth.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In gauging excessiveness, we must keep in mind the purpose of punitive damages: `to punish the defendant and to deter him and others from similar conduct in the future.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.