Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

976 F.2d 1445

Docket No. 92-3110.

United States v. Bailey

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-10-20

Relies on United States v. Poston · Department of Health & Human Services v. Federal Labor Relations Authority · United States v. L Holden

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-10-20

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

Before HARRY T. EDWARDS, D.H. GINSBURG and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c). It is

¶2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of conviction be affirmed. The evidence adduced at trial, taken as a whole, was sufficient to warrant a jury determination of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Poston, 902 F.2d 90, 94 (D.C.Cir.1990).

¶3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.

/976/f2d/1445 · .json · Public domain