Nnadi v. Richter’s Empirical Analysis
976 F.2d 682 · 1992
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Church v. City of Huntsville (1994), Plotner v. AT & T Corp. (2000)
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 1595 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1595A (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1603 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1604 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1607 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1615 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 21 U.S.C. § 881 (§ 511 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty Dollars · Japan Whaling Ass'n v. American Cetacean Society · The Canal Authority of the State of Florida v. Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the United States Army, the Cross-Florida Canal Association v. Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the United States Army, Eleanor H. Miller v. Avery S. Fullerton, Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers of the United States Army, J. G. Perko v. The Canal Authority of the State of Florida, Etc. · Perpich v. Department of Defense · United States v. Four Million, Two Hundred Fifty-Five Thousand
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, (2) a substantial threat of irreparable injury if the injunction were not granted, (3) that the threatened injury to the plaintiff outweighs the harm an injunction may cause the defendant, and (4) that granting the injunction would not disserve the public interest.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n all suits or actions ... brought for the forfeiture of any ... merchandise ... seized under the provisions of any law relating to the collection of duties on imports or tonnage, where the property is claimed by any person, the burden of proof shall lie upon such claimant ... Provided, that probable cause shall be first shown for the institution of such suit or action, to be judged by the court”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t is clear that any significant delay has resulted from Nnadi's failure to exercise her rights in a timely fashion rather than from the government's failure to pursue prompt settlement of Nnadi's claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.