Bosco v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
976 F.2d 710 · 1992
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 2302 · 5 U.S.C. § 4303 · 5 U.S.C. § 5362 · 5 U.S.C. § 5366 · 5 U.S.C. § 7511 · 5 U.S.C. § 7512 · 5 U.S.C. § 7513 · 5 U.S.C. § 7701
Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · United States v. Fausto · Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family Physicians · Traynor v. Turnage · Farmer v. Seiter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[In Fausto,] the Supreme Court did not rale that the CSRA provided the only-means of judicial review of any actions affecting federal employees, but rather that it was the only means of review as to the types of adverse personnel action specifically covered by the CSRA .... [T]he instant case involves a type of personnel action not covered at all by the CSRA, for any employees, whether of the competitive or excepted service____ Since the CSRA thus does not cover the action taken in the instant case, it and the holding of Fausto have no application here.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.