Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

976 F.2d 725

Docket No. 92-6617.

Altizer v. Scott

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: August 31, 1992 Decided: September 18, 1992

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Relies on Marie J. Clinton v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General, U. S. Postal Service

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-91-145)

Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

William Rundahl Coleman, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

Affirmed.

Before SPROUSE and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Frank Altizer appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Altizer v. Scott, No. CA-91-145 (E.D. Va. May 12, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/976/f2d/725 · .json · Public domain